The principal has been accepted as an expert in the Supreme Court of British Columbia (Vancouver, Kelowna and New Westminster), and has given evidence in court on the following;

Shaw Industries v. Gerald Palmer before Mr. Justice Meredith
Loss of profit on 2 single family homes claimed due to actions of G. Palmer; working with Bryan Baynham of Harper Grey Easton legal counsel for the G. Palmer. Accepted as being qualified to give opinion evidence on single family residential construction costs.

White Rock Lodge Ltd v. SCS Engineering before Madam Justice Saunders
Slope collapse and resulting costs and delay claim on condominium apartment project; working with R. Hunter, and D. Garner of Bull Housser & Tupper legal counsel for SCS. Accepted as being qualified to give opinion on construction costs and construction schedule.

Gerald A. Reid v. The Corporation of the District of North Vancouver before Mr. Justice Wilkinson
Building (single family home) settlement due to buried wood products; working with Bryan Baynham of Harper Grey Easton legal counsel for the Corporation Accepted as being qualified to give opinion evidence on construction costs and building code applications.

Nadeu & Sons v. Neumann et al. before Mr. Justice Arkell
Construction deficiencies and poor workmanship on a single family home; working with Glenn J. Neimela of Glenn J. Neimela, Barristers & Solicitors legal counsel for Neumann Accepted as being qualified to give opinion evidence on residential construciton deficienies and cost to correct.

Durman v. Price & Walley before Justice Tyso
Counter claim for repairs to exterior stucco work on single family residence; working with Robert Ellis of Ellis Roadburg legal counsel for Durman. Accepted as being qualified to give opinon evidence on residential construction deficiencies and cost to correct.

Conex v. Bogner before Mr. Justice Curtis
Loss of profit claim on residential condominium project; working with Robert W. McDiarmid of Morelli Chertkow Lawyers legal counsel for Conex. Accepted as being qualified to give opinion evidence on development and construction budgeting procedures and impact of design on contruction costs.

Giesbrecht v. Kwik Pour Foundations Ltd. et al before Mr. Justice Lowry
Claim for repair of deficiencies in a single family home; working with G. Langdon counsel for Giesbrecht. Accepted as being qualified to give opinion evidence identification of and quantification of residential construction deficiencies; cost to correct deficient work, application of the BC Building Code and cost savings achieved through changes in design..

Hil-Ron Cladding Ltd. v. Bosa Bros. Construction Ltd. before Mr. Justice Lowry
Deficient work counter claim on high-rise metal roofing; working with James Hall of Owen Bird legal counsel for Bosa Accepted as being qualified to give opinon evidence on quality of workmanship, roofing deficiencies and cost to correct.

Trakalo v. Hodges, before Mr. Justice Leggat
Claim for repair of latent deficiencies in a single family home; working with Donald T. Mark of Goodwin & Mark legal counsel for Trakalo Accepted as being qualified to give opinon evidence on residential construction deficiencies and cost to correct.

Bolognese v. Shepard, before Mr. Justice Williamson
Claim for repair of deficiencies in a single family home; working with Mark Rozenberg of O'Neil Rozenberg legal counsel for Bolognaise. Accepted as being qualified to give opinion evidence on residential construction deficiencies and cost to correct.

Mitchell v Morton, before Madam Justice Stromberg-Stein
Claim for breach of contract (warranty) on a single family residence; working with Alan Seabrook. Accepted as being qualified to give opinion evidence on residential construction deficiencies and cost to correct.

Day v. Daliwal before Mr. Justice Singh
Claim for default of contract, construction deficiencies and excessive charges on a single family residence. Accepted as being qualified to give opinion evidence on residential construction deficiencies and cost to correct.

Brito et al v Wooley et al before Madame Justice Sinclair Prowse
Claim for renovation costs to family home and provision of adult family residence for handicapped individual. Accepted as being qualified to give opinion evidence on specialized residential construction renovations and purpose designed new construction

Analysis of cost to repair alleged drywall deficiencies in a commercial building; working with M. MacDonald of Mark A. MacDonald. Accepted by the arbitrator, Mr. Glenn Urquhart, as being qualified to give opinion evidence on deficiencies in drywall construction and the cost to correct same.

Analysis of fair market cost to supply and install custom millwork in a single family home working with H. D. Feller of Feller Drysdale. Accepted by the arbitrator, Mr. B. Wallace, as being qualified to give opinion evidence on deficiencies in custom millwork, the cost of manufacturing and installing custom millwork and the identification of deficiencies and the cost to correct same.